ASE July 2025

65

The transition from academic insight to practical implementation demanded

a critical impact assessment. While corporate experience offered valuable in­

dustry insights, Lipi deduced that “the real impact is being made when you’re

making your hands dirty and working on the ground”. This was not a pragmatic

calculation of efficacy: a perceived corporate path, she concluded, “may not give

that much of an impact, or it will take me a longer time”. This pursuit of direct,

accelerated influence propelled her towards her independent setup, driven by

“flexibility and adaptability” principles. Her choice reveals a foundational belief

in the inherent value of tangible, immediate contribution over structured pro­

gression.

Navigating a path where a pioneering parent has already charted the course

presents its challenges, often met with external assumptions of inherent ease.

Lipi acknowledges that people “often think that” her journey is simpler due to

her father’s foundational insights and 25 years of experience. Yet, she maintains

the logical imperative of individual exploration: “everybody has their own path.

He has navigated his own path... it’s a part of my own which I will discover my­

self”. Her generation’s inherent technological fluency defines this distinct jour­

ney. Lipi actively integrates “geospatial software,” “AI data-based solutions,” and

“machine language” to “reduce the human burden of working through that and

then do the work smartly”. This strategic application of intelligence to automate

routine tasks frees up cognitive resources for higher-order strategic thinking,

fundamentally reshaping the approach to environmental problem-solving. Lipi

demonstrates that innovation includes new goals and means to achieve them

efficiently.

Systems Interconnected: Holistic Design for Complex Realities

A common misconception pervades the environmental discourse: elements like

water and ESG are “2 different segments”. Lipi Gandhi argues for a more in­

tegrated reality. Water, she asserts, is fundamentally “a component of ESG as

well”. From her perspective, it is merely “putting the front glasses and looking at

all of it together, because it’s not different components”. This insight is critical:

while the “weight on each component could be different” in varying situations,

they are invariably “part of the same system”. A proper understanding of sustain­

ability necessitates perceiving the interconnected system, rather than dissecting

it into isolated, unrelated parts.

Approaching ‘such complexities’ demands a holistic design philosophy. Lipi’s

method involves first identifying ‘who is at the core of it’ and then discern­