ASE July 2025

60

jects are stronger and more ethical when they are designed with communities

rather than forthem”, making their role “central to both the credibility and lon­

gevity of ecological work”.

• Ecological understanding extends beyond science to include humility,

cultural sensitivity, and local knowledge.

• Ecological integrity is a philosophical, not just scientific, variable, deeply tied

to human history and geopolitics.

• Valuation of nature must include “invisible” cultural and relational values to

avoid ecologically unsound policies.

• Science communication requires balancing accuracy with advocacy, framing

findings into actionable stories for diverse audiences.

• Effective conservation demands collaborative, interdisciplinary approaches,

leveraging diverse tools and empowering local communities.

Test your Reading Comprehension

1. Arghya states that defining oneself “only as a scientist” can sometimes

narrow the lens. How does he primarily identify himself to encompass a

broader ecological understanding?

2. What unique characteristic of conservation in the high-altitude Himalayan

wetlands did Arghya find to be “a philosophical one,” rather than purely

scientific?

3. According to Arghya’s research on economic valuation, which type of

ecosystem services tend to “fall through the cracks” and remain persistently

invisible in decision-making?

4. In Arghya’s view, what is the “real balancing act” for a scientist when

communicating findings about climate change and biodiversity loss?

5. According to Arghya, what is a key reason why conservation and field

research efforts require “long-term flexible funding” from institutions?

Take Quiz

What I learned from Arghya Chakrabarty